The corruption of Justice of the Peace, Christopher Ian Peltzer.
On October 9 2013, at Old City Hall in the city of Toronto, Christopher Peltzer did over step his jurisdiction.
I have been trying to press criminal charges against a former Toronto Police officer, Alan Benton, becuase he wrongfully hit me from behind by his police car, while I was riding my bicycle in 1996. Due to a combinaton of corruption and a judicial system that is a for profit industry, I have to this day been unable to press criminal charges against Alan Benton.
After spending 17 years attempting to use the judicial system against Alan Benton, I finally concluded that I had exhausted all options and would have to do it myself without a lawyer. I was granted a Pre-enquete. The purpose of a pre-enquete is for a complainant to show their evidence to a justice of the peace and for that JP to decide if there is reasonable grounds for a trial (is there enough evidence to make a trail worth while). I had so much evidence and even the testimony of 2 witnesses that it took 3, one hour hearings to present all of it.
At the end of the pre-enquete His worship Christopher I Peltzer did overstep his jurisdiction and violate the rules of his profession in an unethical manner. The JP is charged to draw a threshold decision only (is there enough evidence to provide reasonable grounds for a trial?). Instead Mr Peltzer drew a final conclusion (guilty vs. innocent). A J.P. is not a judge, and does not have the authority to make such a final conclusion.
Mr. Peltzers decision was based on mens rea. That is to say guilty conscious. Mr. Peltzer claimed that he did not know the mens rea of Alan Benton and was unable to draw a guilty conclusion against him for that reason. It is not Mr Peltzers responcibility to conclude guilty vs. innocent. There were many other points to Mr Pelters conclusions too, but he said much of it in latin. This means that I was unable to understand most of what he said. I have also been denied a copy of the Informaton, or even a transcript. which would have his full decision in it.
The reason I am denied the transcript is because they are not allowed to give such information for a pre-enquete that is not granted process to the public. I am not the public, I am the complainant. but they wont give it to me any way.
This means that it is impossible for me to get an appeal to this, because a transcript is a requirement to get an appeal. All of this proves that Christopher Peltzer is in my considered opinion, a very corrupt man who is guilty of obstruction of justice.
I have the constitutional right to
publish this story. The constitution of Canada guarantees freedom of
speech, and freedom of the press. Any attempt to make me remove this
blog will be seen as a violation of those fundamental freedoms, as well as
harassment, and intimidation, and will be refused absolutely.
